147523-547837 - Michelle Glaser- Jul 3, 2017 1217 AM - A World Without

Michelle Glaser Dr. William Sewell English 201 Composition II A World Without Bodies Film ENGL-201-D31-2017SU Composition I A World Without Bodies Film This is a horror movie of the Nazi rule with respect to how it treated persons with disabilities. The film takes the method of a trip to Bernberg: the program -makers tours there with families of disabled people. The close people to honor all who m have died, consider the killings that had been done and reveal upon current day approaches to people living with disabilities . A World without Bodies film articulates an imperative story, and it fixes to a defiantly biased perspective . It is not perfect . Nevertheless, the I nfirmity Film Festival suggests a stage for programme-makers who are not in position to express their work in a conventional setting. This specific film is a brilliant case of precisely why we should rejoice its reality. 8763001559560 Starting with the outline of life science ideology , the filmmakers explore mechanisms of mass murder set up initially to persons with and thereafter moved to intended areas . This film gives a lasting sight into the health and social belief that headed to the or ganized killing of more than 270,000 physically challenged persons during World War II. The film eventually asks us to think of the effect of these actions on our approaches to people with infirmities in our local areas. Before we stretch to the city of Bernberg in the 21st century, audiences are drawn over the acres of clear records detailing the planned slaying of people with disabilities during the Nazi rule . Consider that in Barenberg people with disabilities are taken to hospitals and starved ; plac e cards having the writings 'S ome People Are Born to Be a Burden on The Rest'. There is a boundless agreement of doubt to the organized murder of disabled persons, which is in ways considered more adequate than the losses of other individuals who grieved during the Nazis. Some tried to defend the killings by saying that they were releasing the anguish of the involved. The film-makers prop ose s that this approach implies that this is the way of today's society as well , saying that di sabilities are seldom celebrated on ceremonies to other Holocaust fatalities , and that still view the " mercy killing" of persons with disabilities is right . Persons with disabilities faces several types of stigma which are because of their condition and the unpleasant encounters they have with those they interact with on daily basis. The bond between a person and their relatives is one of the strongest bonds in the world. Therefore, the killing of children and parents breaks this bond and threatens both the health of the parent and the one of the children . One of the stigmas facing protagonist is confusion and the overwhelming situation caused by the threat of the death . He is trying to navigate through an incredibly challenging world in which he has little support. Some parts of the film are horrific. The nurse testifies to the eyesight of viewing seventy stripped Bernberg 'patients' being chattered , snapshots of dark buses with tinted windows which were used to in transportation of disabled people to organizations of death, explanations of the whiffs which must have puffed over Bernberg while preys' bodies were being ashed in the crematorium, the crash as David Mitchell closed the door of the gas chamber. It is weird, seeing a group of people s with disabilities wheel and tremble near gas chambers . This is very absolutely a protest movie . The idea is that there is a great pact of uncertainty towards the organized murder of people with disabilities. Today, people living with mental disability are experiencing a unique type of torture - in addition to the one of living with that condition - separation from their children. Losing custody of a family member is only serving to intensify their pain . As seen in the movie, some of them are going through struggles when their loved ones are murdered in front of them. It is not necessary for a parent living with a disability to lose

Disability Wheelchair Essays

Disability Wheelchair Essays Disability Wheelchair Essay Disability Wheelchair Essay Nancy Mair’s â€Å"Disability† shows us the view a disabled woman has on how the world perceives people with disabilities. Nancy is â€Å"a forty- three year old crippled woman.†(Bedford Reader 13).Nancy is a woman who spends most of her time in a wheelchair. A woman that can be easily spotted in a crowd. She notes that she has not 3show that illustrated her so that people would feel sorry for the woman. They show the woman trying to make one lat trip before she gets crippled. Nancy thinks the show depicts her as unable to make her own choices. She wanted to go to Kenya but her doctor would not let her. Mairs sees the show only showing the fact that she’s disabled but â€Å"excludes the complexities that make her a whole.†(Bedford Reader 14) Mairs considers herself an American Consumer. She uses things that everyone uses in day-to-day life. She’s bothered by the fact that no advertisement ever includes disabled people. The reasoning she thinks behind it is that if they show disabled people doing everyday activity, it will demonstrate how disability can affect anyone. This will make people fear their reality. She thinks that this isolation of disabled people is harmful and even dangerous to the disabled. It makes them feel invisible and almost as if they did not exist. She thinks the only way to integrate disabled people is as quietly and as naturally as possible into people’s everyday life. In â€Å"Disability† Nancy Mairs is trying to show that disabled people are just like regular people. (Bedford reader 14) .And therefore they should be treated as regular people. Mair’s trouble is with advertisers and how they refuse to include the disabled even though the disabled also use their products. She hates the fact that society is obsessed with appearance and normality. She concludes that they don’t use disabled people because of they fear it will cause people. It can show them that disability can affect anyone and everyone. Although Mairs is disabled she prefers to be called crippled. She does not like people feeling sorry for her and that comes along with the word disabled. And the fact that someone might only be nice to her because of her being disabled scares her. Although Mairs needs help  from everyone around her she thinks she can perform everyday tasks just like everyone else. She thinks that if you are crippled that life can still be great and that really it all comes down to you and what you make of life. On a personal note I think Mairs is a great example to follow. She embraces how she is and makes the most of it. She does not complain for the regular things like everyone else. She complains about things that are important and makes her points. She lives her life to the fullest and I think a lot of people could use some of that. People without disabilities do not see or appreciate the things they are able to do each and everyday with ease. They only complain about things that do not matter. But people like Mairs live everyday as it were her last. I would like to read more of Mairs, and I think anyone who complains all day and does not see what other people go through should read what Nancy Mairs has to say.